On my first day in Sheridan I went to the public library to see what I could find relating to my great-grandfather, Joe Elliott. I had one title in mind, and a long one: Banditti of the Plains, or the Cattlemen’s Invasion of Wyoming in 1892 [The Crowning Infamy of the Ages] (1894), by Asa Shinn Mercer. Seattlites might know of Mercer. Here’s the biographical blurb from the dust jacket:
Asa Shinn Mercer founded the University of Washington and established several frontier publications before going to Wyoming in 1883. There he edited Northwest Live Stock Journal and wrote his most significant book, The Banditti of the Plains.
More about this book later.
As I was browsing the shelves around Banditti I saw another title: Secrets: The Tom Wagoner Story (2007), by Collene Pottat. I thumbed through its notes section at the back and noticed reference to “Joe Elliott’s Story.” A little more page turning directed me to the archives of a magazine called Annals of Wyoming, which the Sheridan library has in their “Wyoming Room.”
Thanks to my cousin Marny, most members of my family have a copy the story that B.W. Hope assembled after interviewing Joe Elliott in the early 1940s. I had assumed, for some reason, that it hadn’t made it into publication, so was surprised to find it. I was also very relieved, because I had managed to forget to pack my copy before coming out here.
I will elaborate later on the Wagoner story when I find out more. What I know so far is what Joe Elliott wrote: that many people assumed at the time, and throughout his whole life, that he had killed Wagoner (he denies having done it, but admitted to threatening him). Indeed, most of the things I’ve found so far through web searches mention Joe Elliott as at least involved in Wagoner’s lynching.
After I had made photo copies of Joe Elliott’s Story, I talked to the Wyoming Room librarian about what I’m researching. He asked if I knew about ancestry.com or other genealogy web sites. Such sites typically charge monthly subscription fees, but the library subscribes to at least two sites, which library card holders can access from the library. To show me an example of what I can find, he asked me where Joe Elliott was in 1930. Within a minute he had printed out a page from the 1930 census for Boise, Idaho. Here is what I found under the categories that I could make out (many were illegible).
Head of household, Joe Elliott, age 64; age at first marriage, 42.
Wife, Nettie V. (my mother’s namesake), 56; age at first marriage, 37
Son, Sidney L. 17
Daughter, Virginia J. (my maternal grandmother), 15
Son, Joe, 14
Son, George, 11
Niece, (Della?) Smith, 18
The census also says that everyone in the household could read and write, and all of Joe’s and Nettie’s children had attended school at some time in 1929, though not their niece. They lived at 1419 24th Street in Boise, Idaho. The value of their house was $2,000.
The details that jumped out at me once I had deciphered the blurry printout were, first, that Joe Elliott, having been born in 1860, would have been 70 years old in 1930, not 64 as the census shows. Another discrepancy is Joe’s and Nettie’s ages at the times of their first marriages (and odd and telling category). Joe’s is listed as 42, and Nettie’s as 37.
Joe Elliott was 42 years old in 1902. According to the Story, he was probably in California at this time. He didn’t meet Nettie until he got to Boise, Idaho. Assuming that her first marriage was to Joe, they would have married in or around 1911, when she was 37 — 9 years after Joe Elliott’s assumed first marriage.
Only his marriage to Nettie is mentioned in the Story, and I haven’t heard from any family members about another marriage, but it is very believable, especially after hearing that a woman claiming to be Joe Elliott’s granddaughter is looking for his other descendants. As for the incorrect age on the census form, the only explanation I can think of, aside from a clerical error, is that he lied, perhaps because he was still working and was avoiding age discrimination. If it is a lie, I doubt is has anything to do with hiding the first marriage, as there would still be a 3 year discrepancy with the false age.
The librarian’s quick search also yielded information about Joe Elliott’s work. He didn’t show me where he’d found it, but said that Joe Elliott was a “laborer” and worked for the city of Boise (which might further explain why he would lie on the census).
So, as you can see, the details are already coming in — and I’m just scratching the surface.
So that you can get a better idea what and whom I’m researching, here is the note by B.W. Hope that introduces “Joe Elliott’s Story”:
Joe Elliott (1860-1946) was a stock detective for cattlemen’s associations in Wyoming and South Dakota in the 1880s and 1890s. His name appears frequently in accounts of the range conflicts of the those years. Particularly, histories and reminiscences of the period name him as one of those involved in the hanging of Tom Waggoner, as a member of the party that attacked Nate Champion in the fall of 1891, and as one of the “invaders” in the Johnson County War.
In met Joe Elliott in Boise, Idaho, in the early 1940s. I found him to be an old gentleman who might have been a retired military man. He was intelligent, , well read, respecter of law and authority, somewhat reserved and severe in manner, but as we became better acquainted, willing enough to talk about his past life.
In conversations that extended through several months, he told me of his experiences in the early days in Nebraska, South Dakota, Wyoming and Montana. As my notes on our conversations began to grow into a sequential account of his past life, we decided that after the war we would take a trip into Wyoming and South Dakota, in expectation that visiting old scenes would bring forth new and more complete memories of his experiences. But before this expedition into the past could be undertaken Joe Elliott died, April 17, 1946.
The following record of Joe Elliott’s reminiscences was set down as nearly as possible in his own word. Much of it is exactly as he told it, and all of it is as faithful as possible to Mr. Elliott’s recollections, his opinions, and his manner of speech. Absolute accuracy cannot be guaranteed, of course, due both to the possible deficiencies in my note taking and to the limitations of Mr Elliott’s memory, particularly, it should be pointed out that he never saw my manuscript (since it was considered to be preliminary to the more complete account that I intended to draft after our trip to Wyoming) and he thus had no opportunity to correct or clarify the record. However, I regularly checked and rechecked with him concerning matters on which my notes were incomplete or uncertain, and I believe that the possibility of serious inaccuracy is minimal.






